You know that neighborhood restaurant that has been around
since your parents or even grandparents were kids? Everyone loves it - the food
is pretty good; the staff is friendly, and it has that great nostalgic feel.
Then one day, it's forced to close its doors. Usually little things have
chipped away at it for a while: Newer, hipper restaurants have come onto the
scene, older patrons move on or pass away, etc. Finally, their rent gets jacked
up and they're forced to close. They have a nice sendoff and everyone is a
little sad that an era has come to end.
Yeah, this is nothing like that. While Whittier Law has been
in business for decades, no one should shed any tears about this "going
out of business sale". It may be unfair to say the school has been a scam
since its inception, but it certainly has been part of the greater law school swindle
for the past couple of decades.
Check out the profile of those unfortunate enough to
graduate from this school from the New York Times:
"Last July, only 22 percent of the school’s graduates passed the
California bar exam, according to state data. The employment rate for long-term
jobs requiring a legal degree was 29.7...Students who graduated from Whittier
last year had an average of $179,000 in pre-interest debt..."
There are reports that some stakeholders at Whittier Law are
suing to try to keep the doors open. Might I suggest that they instead express
gratitude that they aren't being arrested and charged with fraud for abusing
the student loan system for years via misleading marketing materials and
gouging their students?
For those who are unaware of the details, Whittier College
decided it had enough of the antics down the street at its eponymously named
law school. By "antics", I mean Whittier Law had become a financial
liability. Prior to the scamblog and transparency movements, law schools were
reliable cash cows for the larger universities and colleges. Now that Whittier
Law has ceased to serve this purpose (and is likely costing big bucks for
Whittier proper to subsidize it), it has been cast aside like a Whittier Law grad's
resume at a respectable law firm - or for that matter any half decent Burger
King.
I'd like to think that someone on the Whittier board of
trustees looked beyond the dollars and cents and recognized that it was
unethical for a school with such pitiful outcomes to be kept afloat.
Nonetheless, the decision was probably all about the money. This is fine. It
means that word is getting out that one shouldn't go to law school, and if one
does, one shouldn't do so without a generous scholarship. The combination of
declining enrollment and the need to offer deep discounts for those who do
enroll apparently torched Whittier; other schools are likely also feeling the
same burn.
In January 2015, I wrote:
This means, that unless the ABA abruptly jettisons all
standards, the absolute garbage schools are going to start coming close to the
end of the rope. They may be willing to tolerate students who don’t know the
difference between long arm statutes and chewing on their own arms, but the
state bar examiners won’t be so kind.
...
For many schools, this is the pathway toward a level of
financial calamity that was once only reserved for their graduates.
Nevertheless, the alternative – academic degradation – will instead send bar
passage rates into the cellar (with the attendant possibility of loss of
accreditation).
I wish I could claim to be prophetic, but this really was
just common sense. (Sorry, I don't know what the stock market will be like in a
month nor who will win the World Series.) For the abysmal schools
(like the late Whittier Law), when the choice is between liberalizing your
admissions policy to enroll barely literate knuckle-draggers or lowering
tuition to $99.99/semester (after discount), it's axiomatic that you aren't
going be long for this academic world.
As others have pointed out, what makes this so monumental is
that this is the first fully ABA accredited institution to bite the dust. Cooley
had to close a campus. I think some dinky unaccredited schools closed their
doors. Indiana Tech barely took flight before its engine burst into flames.
Charlotte Law's board is still shopping around its collective soul to see if there's
some way to salvage that scholastic toilet.
The law school scam has been stubborn to roll over. Heck, it
has been nearly a decade since the Great Recession wave of scam bloggers were
active and this is the first real scalp we've taken.
I know referring to "scalping" isn't exactly
politically correct, but I'm actually a bit "liberal" when it comes to
Custer's Last Stand. General Custer was an arrogant officer, who couldn't
fathom that he could be beaten but a bunch of Indians - sorry, Native Americans,
and his hubris cost him his life.
I see a bit of a parallel to the present situation. I have
never forgotten an early article about the scam when one dean dismissed us as
just a disgruntled minority of graduates. After all, at the time, the law
schools were printing money, and we were unemployed and underemployed losers
typing away on our free blogging platforms.
Now, however, the tribe is bearing down on the beaten and
bloody law school cartel. If the fall of Whittier Law has paved the way for other universities to be so bold, prepare yourselves for the forthcoming massacre, scammers.
In the meantime, play us off, Atlanta Braves fans:
"I'd like to think that someone on the Whittier board of trustees looked beyond the dollars and cents and recognized that it was unethical for a school with such pitiful outcomes to be kept afloat."
ReplyDeleteI would like to think so, too!
Great analysis. Please keep blogging!
This is excellent news! Thanks for helping to highlight the law school scam, Esq. Never.
ReplyDelete